PBM Products wins Lawsuit against Mead Johnson

This is a Sponsored Post written by me on behalf of PBM Products. All opinions are 100% mine.

store brand formulaWith Tucker, I was able to go for 6 months with breastfeeding. I wish I could have gone longer, but he weaned himself early. With Kambry, I tried, but it was in both of our interests to bottle feed. I wasn’t educated on the comparisons or differences between store brand formula and name brand. To be honest, I thought there was a huge difference, so we were hesitant to try it, until a friend’s baby was on it and I compared labels.

I never realized that I could have saved at least $600 a year by using store brand formula. Sure you can save more by nursing, but if you don’t have that option, store brand has all the nutrients that your little one needs.

Last month, PBM Products was awarded $13.5 million false advertising judgment against Mead Johnson that has the potential of forever changing the $3.4 billion infant formula industry in the United States and saving parents significant money each year.

This case for false advertising judgment that was against Mead Johnson, resulted in $13.5 million in damages. U.S. District Court Judge James R. Spencer later stated Mead Johnson must pull any advertising claiming nutritional needs are not met by store brands.

PBM’s store-brand formulas (including those of sold at leading retailers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Walgreens, and many others) cost up to 50% less than Enfamil® LIPIL® and allow parents to save as much as $600 per year on their formula purchases.

What is best for your baby? Store brand formula has the exact same nutritional needs that your baby needs, for far less money.

Visit my sponsor: PBM Wins Suit

Be Sociable, Share!
0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

About Tanya
After working professionally in computer information technology, as well as prior work in the telecommunications industry, Tanya Gordon relocated to southwest Iowa in conjunction with her husband’s job. Mommy Goggles launched over 5 years ago, rising to prominence as a national Mom Blogger and highly sought after by brands to work closely with them on their reach to Mom consumers. In addition, Tanya happily parents two wondrous children who despite best efforts still have been known to engage in ongoing sibling squabbles: Tucker, 6, and Kambry, 3 1/2.You can read more about Tanya here.

Comments

  1. 1
    Neeshia Albrecht says:

    While I will agree that all infant formulas are required to have the same recommended levels of nutrients thus store brands are no better then name brands when it comes to nutrient levels I do think that all infant formulas are made differently. After 3 children who were all bottle fed the only infant formula we’ve been able to use that didn’t cause tummy issues has been Nestle Good Start. Similac caused constipation, Enfamil caused horrible gas, then we switched to Good Start Soy and all our tummy problems were solved. A couple months down the road I was at Walmart and saw how much cheaper Walmart brand Soy formula was so I picked up a can and decided to try it. It didn’t mix well, left an oily residue in the bottle and caused my baby horrible gas pains just like the Enfamil formula had done. So back to Good Start we went and I’ve been using it every since. It might cost me a little bit more but it’s worth it to have a happy baby with a happy tummy.

    [Reply]

Speak Your Mind & feel free to use a smiley! (below)

:bye: 
:good: 
:negative: 
:scratch: 
:wacko: 
:yahoo: 
B-) 
:heart: 
:rose: 
:-) 
:whistle: 
:yes: 
:cry: 
:mail: 
:-( 
:unsure: 
;-)